-
Recent Posts
- Iowa Education Challenges 05/08/2026
- Rethinking the Structure of American Secondary Education, by Qianruo Shen 23/07/2026
- I Got Access to Hundreds of Teacher Misconduct Complaints in California — and You Can Too 18/07/2026
- Modernizing Mathematics Education for Grades 9-14 16/07/2026
- How to Research Private Schools Like an Investigative Reporter 16/07/2026
- The Sage from the East: Michael Xu’s Story as a Mirror to America’s Math Education Crisis 11/07/2026
- Visual Models, Procedural Fluency, and Multiple Strategies:A Cognitive Critique of Common Core Elementary Mathematics 28/06/2026
Comments
- anonymous on Math Anxiety
- Noah on Comments on Zearn’s “Myth of the Math Kid”
- David D. Baskerville on Breaking the Spell of Math Reformists
- Albert B. Franklin on About Us / Comments
Authors
Tag Archives: Fordham Institute
Some Common Core Salespersons’ Salaries: DC Edu-Blob-ulants
Linked are copies of Form 990s for Marc Tucker’s National Center for Education and the Economy (NCEE), Checker Finn’s Fordham Foundation and Fordham Institute, and Bob Wise’s Alliance for Excellent Education (AEE). Each pays himself and at least one other … Continue reading
Posted in Common Core, Education policy, Education Reform, Ethics, research ethics
Tagged Achieve, Alliance for Excellent Education, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Bob Wise, CCSSO, Checker Finn, common core, education reporting, Fordham Institute, Marc Tucker, Mike Petrilli, NCEE, NGA, SBAC, Thomas B. Fordham
1 Comment
Fordham Institute’s pretend research
The Thomas B. Fordham Institute has released a report, Evaluating the Content and Quality of Next Generation Assessments,[i] ostensibly an evaluative comparison of four testing programs, the Common Core-derived SBAC and PARCC, ACT’s Aspire, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ MCAS.[ii] … Continue reading
Posted in College prep, Common Core, Education policy, Education Reform, Ethics, K-12, Mathematics, Reading & Writing, research ethics, Richard P. Phelps, Testing/Assessment, Uncategorized
Tagged CCSSO, CRESST, evaluation, Fordham Institute, Gates Foundation, guidelines, HumRRO, protocols, review, rigor, SCOPE, standards, Student Achievement Partners, testing
3 Comments
Fordham report predictable, conflicted
On November 17, the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) will decide the fate of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) and the Partnership for Assessment of College Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) in the Bay State. … Continue reading
Agustin Tristan
American Psychological Association
Brain Health Alliance Virtual Institute (BHAVI)
Brainiacs Journal
Catherine & Katharine
Education Consumers Foundation
Facilitated Communication Blog
Fulcrum, The
Groupe International de Recherches et expertises en Ingénierie des Evaluations en Formation
If You Can Keep It
Independent Voter Network
Institute for Objective Policy Assessment
James G Martin Center for Academic Renewal
Learning Scientists
Metrication Matters
Nonpartisan Education Review
Parent Coalition for Student Privacy
Retraction Watch
Save Math (California)
Schoolhouse Instiute – Paul Bennet
U.S. Metric Association