-
Recent Posts
- Mary Byrne’s letter to US Education Department regarding information collection under FERPA 18 January, 2021
- The Sabotage of Public Education 18 January, 2021
- Comments of Mary Byrne to Springfield, MO public schools board on critical race theory 30 December, 2020
- K–12: The Life and Death of the Mind 2 November, 2020
- Hoping for a Stronger Focus on Public Education after November 3, 2020 1 November, 2020
- Stanford Professor Jo Boaler’s Math Revolution and War Against Algebra 2 28 October, 2020
- Academic Fitness 6 October, 2020
Comments
- AMIDU EDSON on Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don’t Understand the Basics of Testing
- amidu edson on K-12 is a land of mystery
- Sheldon Bennett on About Us
- Bruce Deitrick Price on K-12 is a land of mystery
Authors
Tag Archives: Fordham Institute
Some Common Core Salespersons’ Salaries: DC Edu-Blob-ulants
Linked are copies of Form 990s for Marc Tucker’s National Center for Education and the Economy (NCEE), Checker Finn’s Fordham Foundation and Fordham Institute, and Bob Wise’s Alliance for Excellent Education (AEE). Each pays himself and at least one other … Continue reading
Posted in Common Core, Education policy, Education Reform, Ethics, research ethics
Tagged Achieve, Alliance for Excellent Education, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Bob Wise, CCSSO, Checker Finn, common core, education reporting, Fordham Institute, Marc Tucker, Mike Petrilli, NCEE, NGA, SBAC, Thomas B. Fordham
1 Comment
Fordham Institute’s pretend research
The Thomas B. Fordham Institute has released a report, Evaluating the Content and Quality of Next Generation Assessments,[i] ostensibly an evaluative comparison of four testing programs, the Common Core-derived SBAC and PARCC, ACT’s Aspire, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ MCAS.[ii] … Continue reading
Posted in College prep, Common Core, Education policy, Education Reform, Ethics, K-12, Mathematics, Reading & Writing, research ethics, Richard P. Phelps, Testing/Assessment, Uncategorized
Tagged CCSSO, CRESST, evaluation, Fordham Institute, Gates Foundation, guidelines, HumRRO, protocols, review, rigor, SCOPE, standards, Student Achievement Partners, testing
3 Comments
Fordham report predictable, conflicted
On November 17, the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) will decide the fate of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) and the Partnership for Assessment of College Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) in the Bay State. … Continue reading
