-
Recent Posts
- Here’s how Idaho can develop academically strong ELA and Mathematics Standards when it revises its current standards* 20 August, 2020
- What can we do now: Education in America is a victim of Covid 19 28 July, 2020
- K-12 is a land of mystery 29 May, 2020
- Keep the Students but Get Rid of Their Bodies — A Practical Response to Educational Super-Inflation 12 May, 2020
- Who’s Telling the Truth about Alabama’s Constitutional Amendment One? 1 March, 2020
- Response to John Merrow’s advocacy of Project-based Learning 6 February, 2020
- Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don’t Understand the Basics of Testing 26 December, 2019
Comments
- AMIDU EDSON on Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don’t Understand the Basics of Testing
- amidu edson on K-12 is a land of mystery
- Sheldon Bennett on About Us
- Bruce Deitrick Price on K-12 is a land of mystery
Authors
Tag Archives: testing
“Organizationally orchestrated propaganda” at ETS
With the testing opt-out movement growing in popularity in 2016, Common Core’s profiteers began to worry. Lower participation enough and the entire enterprise could be threatened: with meaningless aggregate scores; compromised test statistics vital to quality control; and a strong … Continue reading
Posted in Censorship, College prep, Common Core, Education policy, Ethics, information suppression, Richard P. Phelps
Tagged ETS, opt out, opting out, Randy Bennett, testing
Leave a comment
Fordham Institute’s pretend research
The Thomas B. Fordham Institute has released a report, Evaluating the Content and Quality of Next Generation Assessments,[i] ostensibly an evaluative comparison of four testing programs, the Common Core-derived SBAC and PARCC, ACT’s Aspire, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ MCAS.[ii] … Continue reading
Posted in College prep, Common Core, Education policy, Education Reform, Ethics, K-12, Mathematics, Reading & Writing, research ethics, Richard P. Phelps, Testing/Assessment, Uncategorized
Tagged CCSSO, CRESST, evaluation, Fordham Institute, Gates Foundation, guidelines, HumRRO, protocols, review, rigor, SCOPE, standards, Student Achievement Partners, testing
3 Comments
Overtesting or Overcounting?
Commenting on the Center for American Progress’s (CAP’s) report, Testing Overload in America’s Schools, https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education/report/2014/10/16/99073/testing-overload-in-americas-schools/ …and the Education Writers’ Association coverage of it, http://www.ewa.org/blog-ed-beat/how-much-time-do-students-spend-taking-tests … Some testing opponents have always said there is overtesting, no matter how much there has … Continue reading
Posted in College prep, Education policy, K-12, Richard P. Phelps, Testing/Assessment
Tagged Center for, overtesting, standardized, testing
Leave a comment
