-
Recent Posts
- K-12 is a land of mystery 29 May, 2020
- Keep the Students but Get Rid of Their Bodies — A Practical Response to Educational Super-Inflation 12 May, 2020
- Who’s Telling the Truth about Alabama’s Constitutional Amendment One? 1 March, 2020
- Response to John Merrow’s advocacy of Project-based Learning 6 February, 2020
- Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don’t Understand the Basics of Testing 26 December, 2019
- Romanian officials’ nonchalant reaction to 2018 PISA results 19 December, 2019
- The Hechinger Report on college admission testing 13 October, 2019
Comments
- Bruce Deitrick Price on K-12 is a land of mystery
- Donna Garner on Who’s Telling the Truth about Alabama’s Constitutional Amendment One?
- David A Flinn on Who’s Telling the Truth about Alabama’s Constitutional Amendment One?
- Donna Garner on Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don’t Understand the Basics of Testing
Authors
Tag Archives: research bias
Fordham report predictable, conflicted
On November 17, the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) will decide the fate of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) and the Partnership for Assessment of College Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) in the Bay State. … Continue reading
The Gauntlet: How think tanks and federally-funded centers misrepresent and suppress other education research
New in the Nonpartisan Education Review: http://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Essays/v10n1.htm The aggressive, career-strategic behavior of researchers in federally funded centers and think tanks creates many problems, including a loss of useful information and bad public policies based on skewed information. But, two adverse … Continue reading
Posted in Education policy, K-12, Richard P. Phelps, Testing/Assessment, Uncategorized
Tagged Brookings, censorship, Chingos, CRESST, GAO, Goertz, information suppression, NRC, research bias
Leave a comment
