-
Recent Posts
- Education Next, the Fordham Institute, and Common Core 14 July, 2019
- New “science and society” podcast 24 June, 2019
- Keeping Journalists in the Dark: ‘Citation Cartels’ Limit Public Knowledge 17 May, 2019
- Mathematics and Science Courses Required or Recommended for Admission into Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs at Massachusetts Institutions of Higher Education (2003) 5 May, 2019
- US Education’s Dominant Research Method: Cherry Picking Evidence 5 May, 2019
- The elitist strain in US education journalism 5 May, 2019
- There’s A Deeper Systemic Problem in the College Admissions Scandal No One Is Talking About 14 April, 2019
Twitter Feed
-
"People might seek fewer social interactions when they are feeling happy, and they might seek more social interacti… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
-
National Popular Vote: A Status Update fairvote.org/national_popul…
-
Book Review: A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy by Russell Muirhead and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
-
Should children clean their own schools? Japan thinks so. good.is/articles/japan…
-
Teach for America: A Nimble Organization or a Case of Donor Hijacking? nonprofitquarterly.org/teach-for-amer… via @npquarterly
-
Public Highly Critical of State of Political Discourse in the U.S. pewrsr.ch/2x0WXi3
-
On Adversity Scores bit.ly/2Rvk4ed via @NASorg
-
Comments
Authors
Tag Archives: research bias
Fordham report predictable, conflicted
On November 17, the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) will decide the fate of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) and the Partnership for Assessment of College Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) in the Bay State. … Continue reading
The Gauntlet: How think tanks and federally-funded centers misrepresent and suppress other education research
New in the Nonpartisan Education Review: http://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Essays/v10n1.htm The aggressive, career-strategic behavior of researchers in federally funded centers and think tanks creates many problems, including a loss of useful information and bad public policies based on skewed information. But, two adverse … Continue reading
Posted in Education policy, K-12, Richard P. Phelps, Testing/Assessment, Uncategorized
Tagged Brookings, censorship, Chingos, CRESST, GAO, Goertz, information suppression, NRC, research bias
Leave a comment
