-
Recent Posts
- Who’s Telling the Truth about Alabama’s Constitutional Amendment One? 1 March, 2020
- Response to John Merrow’s advocacy of Project-based Learning 6 February, 2020
- Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don’t Understand the Basics of Testing 26 December, 2019
- Romanian officials’ nonchalant reaction to 2018 PISA results 19 December, 2019
- The Hechinger Report on college admission testing 13 October, 2019
- Beware New Quality Counts State Rankings 5 September, 2019
- Back to school means education news stories …for a while 29 August, 2019
Twitter Feed
Sorry, no Tweets were found.
Comments
- Donna Garner on Who’s Telling the Truth about Alabama’s Constitutional Amendment One?
- David A Flinn on Who’s Telling the Truth about Alabama’s Constitutional Amendment One?
- Donna Garner on Test Critics Fail the Test: Critics of Testing Don’t Understand the Basics of Testing
- Robert Schaeffer on The Hechinger Report on college admission testing
Authors
Tag Archives: guidelines
Fordham Institute’s pretend research
The Thomas B. Fordham Institute has released a report, Evaluating the Content and Quality of Next Generation Assessments,[i] ostensibly an evaluative comparison of four testing programs, the Common Core-derived SBAC and PARCC, ACT’s Aspire, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ MCAS.[ii] … Continue reading
Posted in College prep, Common Core, Education policy, Education Reform, Ethics, K-12, Mathematics, Reading & Writing, research ethics, Richard P. Phelps, Testing/Assessment, Uncategorized
Tagged CCSSO, CRESST, evaluation, Fordham Institute, Gates Foundation, guidelines, HumRRO, protocols, review, rigor, SCOPE, standards, Student Achievement Partners, testing
3 Comments
