{"id":476,"date":"2017-07-08T20:13:00","date_gmt":"2017-07-09T00:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/?p=476"},"modified":"2025-12-12T23:15:00","modified_gmt":"2025-12-13T04:15:00","slug":"close-all-used-funded-research-centers-evaluation-of-existing-regulations-my-two-bits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/2017\/07\/close-all-used-funded-research-centers-evaluation-of-existing-regulations-my-two-bits\/","title":{"rendered":"Close all USED-funded research centers: Evaluation of existing regulations: My two bits"},"content":{"rendered":"

My comments below in response to the USED request for comments on existing USED regulations. To submit your own, follow the instructions at:\u00a0 https:\/\/www.regulations.gov\/document?D=ED-2017-OS-0074-0001<\/a><\/p>\n

MEMORANDUM
\nTo:\u00a0 Hilary Malawer, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Education
\nFrom:\u00a0 Richard P. Phelps
\nDate:\u00a0 July 8, 2017
\nRe:\u00a0 Evaluation of Existing Regulations[1]<\/a><\/p>\n

Greetings:<\/p>\n

I encourage the US Education Department to eliminate from any current and future funding education research centers. Ostensibly, federally funded education research centers fill a \u201cneed\u201d for more research to guide public policy on important topics. But, the research centers are almost entirely unregulated, so they can do whatever they please. And, what they please is too often the promotion of their own careers and the suppression or denigration of competing ideas and evidence.<\/p>\n

Federal funding of education research centers concentrates far too much power in too few hands. And, that power is nearly unassailable. One USED funded research center, the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) blatantly and repeatedly misrepresented research I had conducted while at the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) in favor of their own small studies on the same topic. I was even denied attendance at public meetings where my research was misrepresented. Promises to correct the record were made, but not kept.<\/p>\n

When I appealed to the USED project manager, he replied that he had nothing to say about \u201ceditorial\u201d matters. In other words, a federally funded education research center can write and say anything that pleases, or benefits, the individuals inside.<\/p>\n

Capturing a federally funded research center contract tends to boost the professional provenance of the winners stratospherically. In the case of CRESST, the principals assumed control of the National Research Council\u2019s Board on Testing and Assessment, where they behaved typically\u2014citing themselves and those who agree with them, and ignoring, or demonizing, the majority of the research that contradicted their work and policy recommendations.<\/p>\n

Further, CRESST principals now seem to have undue influence on the assessment research of the international agency, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which, as if on cue, has published studies that promote the minority of the research sympathetic to CRESST doctrine while simply ignoring even the existence of the majority of the research that is not. The rot\u2014the deliberate suppression of the majority of the relevant research–has spread worldwide, and the USED funded it.<\/p>\n

In summary, the behavior of the several USED funded research centers I have followed over the years meet or exceed the following thresholds identified in the President\u2019s Executive Order 13777:<\/p>\n

(ii) Are outdated, unnecessary, or ineffective;<\/p>\n

(iii) Impose costs that exceed benefits;<\/p>\n

(iv) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with regulatory reform initiatives and policies;<\/p>\n

(v) Are inconsistent with the requirements of section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516 note), or the guidance issued pursuant to that provision, in particular those regulations that rely in whole or in part on data, information, or methods that are not publicly available or that are insufficiently transparent to meet the standard for reproducibility.<\/p>\n

Below, I cite only relevant documents that I wrote myself, so as not to implicate anyone else. As the research center principals gain power, fewer and fewer of their professional compatriots are willing to disagree with them. The more power they amass, the more difficult it becomes for contrary evidence and points of view, no matter how compelling or true, to even get a hearing.<\/p>\n

References:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Phelps, R. P. (2015, July). The Gauntlet: Think tanks and federally funded centers misrepresent and suppress other education research. New Educational Foundations, 4<\/em>. https:\/\/www.newfoundations.com\/NEFpubs\/NEF4Announce.html<\/a><\/p>\n

Phelps, R. P. (2014, October). Review of Synergies for Better Learning: An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment<\/em> (OECD, 2013), Assessment in Education: Principles, Policies, & Practices<\/em>. doi:10.1080\/0969594X.2014.921091 https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/0969594X.2014.921091#.VTKEA2aKJz1<\/a><\/p>\n

Phelps, R. P. (2013, February 12). What Happened at the OECD<\/a>? Education News<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Phelps, R. P. (2013, January 28). OECD Encourages World to Adopt Failed US Ed Programs<\/a>. Education News<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Phelps, R. P. (2013). The rot spreads worldwide: The OECD \u2013 Taken in and taking sides. New Educational Foundations, 2<\/em>(1). Preview: https:\/\/www.newfoundations.com\/NEFpubs\/NEFv2Announce.html<\/a><\/p>\n

Phelps, R. P. (2012, June). Dismissive reviews: Academe\u2019s Memory Hole. Academic Questions<\/em>, 25<\/em>(2), pp. 228\u2013241. doi:10.1007\/s12129-012-9289-4 https:\/\/www.nas.org\/articles\/dismissive_reviews_academes_memory_hole<\/a><\/p>\n

Phelps, R. P. (2012). The effect of testing on student achievement, 1910\u20132010. International Journal of Testing<\/em>, 12<\/em>(1), 21\u201343. https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1080\/15305058.2011.602920<\/a><\/p>\n

Phelps, R. P. (2010, July). The source of Lake Wobegon [updated]. Nonpartisan Education Review \/ Articles, 1(2).<\/em> https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/Review\/Articles\/v6n3.htm<\/a><\/p>\n

Phelps, R. P. (2000, December). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation, Book review, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), <\/em>992\u2013999. https:\/\/richardphelps.net\/HighStakesReview.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

Phelps, R. P. (1999, April). Education establishment bias? A look at the National Research Council\u2019s critique of test utility studies. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist,<\/em> 36(4)<\/em> 37\u201349. https:\/\/www.siop.org\/TIP\/backissues\/Tipapr99\/4Phelps.aspx<\/a><\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> In accordance with Executive Order 13777, \u201cEnforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda,\u201d the Department of Education (Department) is seeking input on regulations that may be appropriate for repeal, replacement, or modification.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

My comments below in response to the USED request for comments on existing USED regulations. To submit your own, follow the instructions at:\u00a0 https:\/\/www.regulations.gov\/document?D=ED-2017-OS-0074-0001 MEMORANDUM To:\u00a0 Hilary Malawer, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Education … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"no","footnotes":""},"categories":[137,80,31,90,89,138,32,187,71,23,14],"tags":[207],"class_list":["post-476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship","category-common-core","category-education-policy-2","category-education-reform","category-ethics","category-information-suppression","category-k-12","category-oecd","category-research-ethics","category-richard-p-phelps","category-testingassessment","tag-federal-regulations"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=476"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1515,"href":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476\/revisions\/1515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/blog1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}