by Glynn D. Ligon, now posted in the Nonpartisan Education Review.<\/p>\n
https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/Review\/Articles\/v15n2.htm<\/a><\/p>\n The Preface:<\/p>\n Critics of testing students don\u2019t understand the basics of testing. We let critics get away with bogus arguments that undermine the benefits of testing our students. Parents are misled into opposing a unique source of information about their schools\u2014and their children. Worse, some opt their own kids out of a valuable validator of their academic progress.<\/p>\n Critics of state tests are doing parents and educators a disservice. I trust the critics are merely misinformed; however, their attacks are often simply not based on fact. The news media validates the critics without benefit of having a basic background in testing. The state and district testing staffs have taken such politically cautious stances that they too seldom speak as advocates for the tests they are hired to administer and interpret. I venture to say the state and district test directors agree with me that the critics are off base most of time. I don\u2019t know why we feel obligated to state our few agreements with critics\u2019 tangential points before we begin destroying their numerous and overwhelming false premises.<\/p>\n I\u2019m taken aback by four observations.<\/p>\n \u2022 Too few professionals are taking up for the tests. What\u2019s needed in this debate is an unbiased, informed perspective. I no longer have a stake in this. I\u2019m a former teacher, a former test director, and a former parent of public school students. I still have a Ph.D. in measurement and have read all the criticisms of testing. I constantly talk with parents who believe the criticisms of testing. I read the news articles about state testing and accountability.<\/p>\n So, here I go. I\u2019m taking a \u201clet\u2019s get this debate centered on the issues and facts\u201d position.<\/p>\n The attack on state tests is akin to Clark Kent being bullied on the playground as a kid and not being allowed to use his powers to defend himself. Somehow, it has become politically impolite to correct or challenge the test critics without first having to agree with one of their marginal points. The test pros seem to feel obligated to begin their response by agreeing with the test critics\u2019 red herrings that make them appear to be legitimate defenders of our schools, students, and tax payer dollars. Sorry, critics. I\u2019m not doing that. Not being a public employee, nor representing a testing company, I\u2019ll say what should be said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" by Glynn D. Ligon, now posted in the Nonpartisan Education Review. https:\/\/nonpartisaneducation.org\/Review\/Articles\/v15n2.htm The Preface: Critics of testing students don\u2019t understand the basics of testing. We let critics get away with bogus arguments that undermine the benefits of testing our students. … Continue reading
\n\u2022 The critics are getting away with their misrepresentations and recasting of the issues.
\n\u2022 School accountability systems are being undermined.
\n\u2022 The states are trying to do too much with their state proficiency tests.<\/p>\n