Tag Archives: PARCC

‘One size fits all’ national tests not deeper or more rigorous

http://www.educationnews.org/education-policy-and-politics/one-size-fits-all-national-tests-not-deeper-or-more-rigorous/ Some say that now is a wonderful time to be a psychometrician — a testing and measurement professional. There are jobs aplenty, with high pay and great benefits. Work is available in the private sector at test development firms; … Continue reading

Posted in College prep, Common Core, Education policy, Education Reform, K-12, research ethics, Richard P. Phelps, Testing/Assessment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on ‘One size fits all’ national tests not deeper or more rigorous

How the USED has managed to get it wrong, again

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2016/02/03/dad-my-state-now-requires-11th-graders-to-take-the-sat-not-my-daughter/ An interesting dilemma. Common Core’s writers planned for a grade 11 test that would tell us whether or not students were college and career ready. Parents and state legislators don’t know who sets the cut score, what test items … Continue reading

Posted in College prep, Common Core, Education policy, ESSA, K-12, Reading & Writing, Sandra Stotsky, Testing/Assessment | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Fordham report predictable, conflicted

On November 17, the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) will decide the fate of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) and the Partnership for Assessment of College Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) in the Bay State. … Continue reading

Posted in Common Core, Education policy, Education Reform, Mathematics, Reading & Writing, research ethics, Richard P. Phelps, Testing/Assessment | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Fordham report predictable, conflicted