Home Page - Nonpartisan Education Review

Nonpartisan Education Review

The Nonpartisan Education Review provides a forum for those interested in education issues but put off by the closed and censorial education policy groups affiliated with the political parties. We aim to make a difference by remaining non-aligned and non-partisan. Learn more about us and read the Nonpartisan Education Review® (ISSN 2150-6477), our peer-reviewed, open access electronic journal.  

Nonpartisan Education Review: ALL CONTENT, 2005-2017

New in the Nonpartisan Education Review:

Special Section: The Common Core Dissenters:
In June 2010, the National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers released Reaching Higher: The Common Core State Standards Validation Committee. The committee comprised 28 members, but the report included only 24 signatures. The 4 who did not go along are Alfinio Flores (U. Delaware), R. James Milgram (Stanford U.), Sandra Stotsky (U Arkansas), and Dylan Wiliam (ETS). Professor Flores declined to submit an explanation. But, dissents from Professors Milgram, Stotsky, and Wiliam can be found here:

Also in the Nonpartisan Education Review:

Special Section: The Problem of Private Data in Education Research: Special Section: Depraved Indifference: Testing Experts and Education Policy Point-Counterpoint: Educators, Cheating, & Testing Standards:

Nonpartisan Education Review: ALL CONTENT, 2005-2017

INTRODUCING: The Learning Scientists:
"We are cognitive psychological scientists interested in research on education. Our main research focus is on the science of learning. Our Vision is to make scientific research on learning more accessible to students, teachers, and other educators. We aim to: motivate students to study; increase the use of effective study and teaching strategies that are backed by research; and decrease negative views of testing. This is not a product or a sales pitch - just science!"

ANNOUNCING: Recent Pioneer Institute reports on Common Core:
The Education Writers Association Casts its Narrowing Gaze on Boston
Fordham Institute’s Pretend Research
Setting academic performance standards: MCAS vs. PARCC
Testing the tests: Why MCAS is better than PARCC
Drilling through the Core: Why Common Core is bad for American education
The Revenge of K-12: How Common Core and the new SAT lower college standards in the U.S.

ANNOUNCING: Barry Garelick is featured on a Heartland Institute podcast, discussing "The Math Wars from a Teacher's Eyes". See also his article series there:
I. A Common Sense Approach to Common Core Math
II. Third-grade fractions
III. Drawing diagrams for dividing fractions
IV. Making Connections, One Concept at a Time
Who's to say teachers cannot modify Common Core? No one.
Pernicious Egalitarianism Shrinks 8th Grade Algebra Programs
Common Core Math Standards Intensify the Existing Reform Math Agenda
Common Core Math Standards Encourage Dubious ‘Inquiry-Based’ Approaches

INTRODUCING: New Educational Foundations: A Trans-ideological Journal of Criticism and ReviewTM. Volume 1, Volume 2 & Volume 3 & Volume 4

SEE: Nonpartisan Education Review Board member Elizabeth Carson on EdCast (with Professors Fred Greenleaf and Sylvain Cappell, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, NYU.), TOPIC: Math Education Reform: Does It Add Up?

INTRODUCING: Independent Voter News, "Unfiltered community news by independent contributors." (Tired of the Education Week, education-establishment, think-tank echo chamber?)

INTRODUCING: Team Metric, an organization with a mission.
"STEM curricula must move towards a greater focus and coherence; we believe that no change would achieve this goal more effectively than removing US customary (inch-pound) units from formal education. A Metric-only approach to STEM education would provide a rational, science-based, intuitive system to learn and build upon. We support metric-only education."

ProCon.org posts an issue page on standardized tests. (See also their issue page on teacher tenure, issue page on school vouchers, and Teachers' Corner: ProCon.org for Educators, Librarians, and Administrators.)

Nonpartisan Education Review: ALL CONTENT, 2005-2017

[Back to Top]

Follow Us On Twitter Follow Us On LinkedIn Follow Our Blog



Tom Oakland Thomas D. Oakland


Bob Oliphant

Robert T. Oliphant


Mary Lyn Bourque

Mary Lyn Bourque


Martin Turner

Martin V.L. Turner